An expert review
You want a sharp look at what’s live before deciding what to change.
Tell me what you need to decide. I’ll pick the method that answers it, write down exactly what you get, and you only pay for what’s useful.
Every project is scoped around your product, your people and your question. The proposal sets out the work, what you get and the fee.
You want a sharp look at what’s live before deciding what to change.
You need to see how the right people actually try the task, or what they need.
Your team has shipped a fix and wants proof the problem’s gone.
You don’t have to do all three, or in this order. Sometimes an accessibility check or a drop-off investigation is the right first move.
We talk, then I send a written proposal with the work, what you get and the fee. Nothing starts until you’ve agreed it.
How many tasks and how complex, the method, recruiting participants, access needs, incentives, recordings and what you want at the end. The proposal puts a number on all of it.
No. They answer different questions. I can spot a lot of problems on my own, but watching real people shows you things no expert can predict. Pick based on what you need to decide.
No. I find the problems and tell you what to fix. You choose who builds it. That keeps my advice honest.
Not by default. If you want ongoing work, we agree it separately, with its own scope.